The Employment Tribunal case  of Sault v Empire Amusements & Cheeky Monkey’s Soft Play Centre acts as a useful reminder to employers to clearly communicate an employee’s dismissal and importantly, ensure they have evidence they have done so.

Ms Sault was absent from work through ill health for several weeks and had failed to keep in regular touch with the employer whilst off. The employer claimed they hand delivered a letter to Ms Sault’s home address explaining that if they did not hear from her within seven days, they would end her employment. There was no contact from Ms Sault and they claimed a second hand-delivered letter was left on 14th March 2020 telling the Claimant that she had been dismissed without notice.

On 23rd March 2020, Ms Sault sent the employer in a fit note. The Respondent acknowledged receipt and wrote to her explaining that she was not eligible for Statutory Sick Pay (SSP). The SSP1 form contains a section for the employer to explain why SSP could not be paid. The reason given the employer gave was  because Ms Sault’s earnings were too low to qualify. They did not tick the box to say she could not be paid because her employment had come to an end.

Ms Sault claimed that she never received the hand-delivered letters and was unaware of her dismissal until 4th July 2020 when she returned to work to be told by a manager that she had been dismissed and replaced.

Ms Saut brought a claim for unfair dismissal.

The issue at the preliminary hearing was whether the claim was presented in time – that is, within three months (less one day) of the date of dismissal  and after allowing for the period of Acas Early Conciliation. Time limits are crucial.

The claim form itself was issued on 6 October 2020 and the Acas period of early conciliation started on 3rd September. The Acas certificate was issued on  25th September 2020. If  the effective date of termination (the date of dismissal) is the 14 March, the claim was presented outside of the primary 3 month time limit. If the effective date of termination is 4 July, the clam was presented within time.

Considering all the evidence the Employment Judge decided that the effective date of termination  was 4th July 2020 – the date she returned to work.  The employer had no evidence that their letters had been delivered.

What can employers learn from this?

Quite simply, always use recorded delivery, or email and ask for read receipts, but whatever you do, don’t hand deliver unless you’re going to get proof of actually having done it.

25th June 2022

FREE first advice

Have you ever wanted to just ask an expert employment law solicitor if they can help you, without worrying about what it may cost to contact them?

Get in touch

We’d like to talk to you to see what we can do to help, so please either call us anytime for free on 08000 614 631, email us or use the form below.

Together we can work out what your next steps might be...in confidence, at no cost and with no obligation.

SIGN UP TO RECEIVE UP TO THE MINUTE EMPLOYMENT LAW AND HR NEWS STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX

* indicates required
McCabe and Co Solicitors will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing. Please let us know all the ways you would like to hear from us:
You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at philip@mccabeandco.com. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.
We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.